The Italian Court’s ruling against ENI in its defamation case over the Malabu oil scandal underscores the principle that truthful investigative reporting, even on contentious topics, is protected under free speech laws.
Justice Francesca Giacomini’s decision on December 7, 2024, dismissed ENI’s €5 million defamation claim against journalist Claudio Gatti and publishing company Società Editoriale Il Fatto SpA, reaffirming the legitimacy of investigative journalism as an essential element of accountability and transparency.
While ENI claimed defamation due to allegations of bribery and exploitation in Claudio Gatti’s book ENIGATE, the court found the publication to be based on judicial documents and credible sources, thereby rejecting ENI’s claims.
This ruling also resonates internationally, as U.S. Congresswomen Maxine Waters and Joyce Beatty have called for renewed investigations into Shell and ENI under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Their letter highlights alleged bribery schemes that reportedly cost Nigeria $6 billion in future revenues, emphasizing the ongoing global focus on corporate accountability in resource exploitation.
The court’s decision not only vindicates Gatti and Il Fatto SpA but also reinforces the role of the press in exposing corruption and safeguarding public interest, especially in cases involving significant socio-economic impacts like the Malabu scandal.